SUPPORT OUR TROOPS
November 9, 2008
Deane Oliva
War is a reality! No matter what your ethical, conceptual stance, war is
real. Mythically, we yearn to believe that military service builds
character, extols the nation’s values and teaches one about life. We want to
believe that it is a rite of passage, an initiation from adolescence into
adulthood. One joins the Army to “fight for right” and to “become a man.”
Ideally, we fantasize, when warriors return from war, they will be greeted
as a heroes, ready to take their place as wise and valued members of
society. This is the warrior archetype.
War is a reality! No matter what your ethical, conceptual stance, war is
real. Mythically, we yearn to believe that military service builds
character, extols the nation’s values and teaches one about life. We
want to believe that it is a rite of passage, an initiation from
adolescence into adulthood. One joins the Army to “fight for right” and
to “become a man.” Ideally, we fantasize, when warriors return from war,
they will be greeted as a heroes, ready to take their place as wise and
valued members of society. This is the warrior archetype.
POOF! SPLAT! Let’s erase that fantasy. That is simply not the way it is.
To create a soldier, the moral and social values which have been
instilled since childhood must be shattered to fit the needs of war.
Each recruit must be trained to obey orders without hesitation,
to kill on command, and to respond to threat instinctively.
[READINGS]
A: Though young people in the military may hunger to become warriors, in
most cases they become soldiers instead.
Warrior and soldier are different roles, different archetypes.
The role of the soldier may be the modern remnant of the warrior
archetype in that it is mass produced, wired with technology, and given
no honest sense of transcendent purpose or lifelong usefulness…Rather,
today’s recruits are trained quickly and efficiently to behave as part
of a mass machine of destruction. Their purpose is to serve as a
functional part of this machine and to survive if they can..[i]
B: Stripping recruits of most vestiges of civilian identity, having them
practice techniques of killing until they can repeat them unconsciously,
working them to exhaustion, intimidating them with demeaning nicknames
and tasks, and punishing those who resist indoctrination are just a few
of the common strategies. One
veteran reported that his first psychological trauma occurred not in
combat but during basic training when his drill sergeant forced his
squad to crush kittens to death in their hands.
He cried, declaring it was wrong and he couldn’t do it. He was
shamed until, near breaking he killed his kitten. He reports that he
cried over the kitten’s death but later was able to kill people without
remorse.[ii]
C: For the warrior’s experience to be transformative, it must also be
indicative of personal valor.
But in contrast to the time when personal courage and strength made all the
difference, in modern combat the best soldiers are often injured or killed.
Behaving according to archaic principles of warrior-hood in the face of high
speed weapons technology makes warriors more vulnerable instead of more
heroic. Once a man who raced across a battlefield might become a hero by
successfully dodging spears or arrows. Today, the same act would likely get
him slaughtered in a storm of fire.
And when skill, intelligence, and nobility do not count, then nothing
is proven by survival.
[iii]
The difference between warrior and soldier is conceptually huge.
The warrior is valiant, ethical, and a revered member of society
fighting to uphold its honor and safety.
A soldier’s motivation is often not as clear. In the most recent wars
in which Americans have been deployed, the reasons for fighting have been
vague, they have not involved homeland risk, the threat has not been
experienced directly, the end goal was not cleanly defined, and the
opportunities for individual achievement were minimal. The warrior seeking
participant would likely have been frustrated and confused.
As one World War II combatant stated, “I went to war to show Hitler
that Jews did have guts, that we are men.
What I didn’t know before the slaughter is that it didn’t’ matter.
Not Hitler or any leaders on either side cared what happened to me.”[iv]
That has not always been the case.
In pre-modern war technology, war was an intimate activity.
Participants, charged with the fervor of a beloved cause, fought
specific targets with intensity and focus, each cognizant of how much was
personally and nationally at stake for them.
Their part in the war counted and the human lives they took were
specific to the stated needs.
As our technology has increased, war has lost its intimacy.
[READINGS]
D: For example, the Gulf War (1990-1991) was lauded as an operation causing
little loss to U S forces.
During hostilities, the United States suffered 148 combat deaths, 235 other
deaths, and 467 wounded.
However, this low casualty rate comprised only what was immediately suffered
during the short period of active combat.
As of May 2002, more than a decade later, the Veterans Administration
had recognized a total of 262,586 veterans disabled due to Gulf War duties
and 10,617 dead of combat-related injuries and illnesses since.
That raises the casualty rate of American forces in the Gulf War to
the rather substantial figure of 30.8 percent.[v]
E: In the 2001 war in Afghanistan,
the United States used cluster bombs so extensively that it became an
international controversy. In
the first week of that war alone, B-1 bombers dropped 50 cluster bombs,
scattering 10,100 bomblets.
According to the United Nations—as the cumulative result of the U S military
presence in 2001, the Soviet Russian wars in the mid-1980s, and recent
ecological crises such as a severe regional drought—Afghanistan has suffered
a 40-70 percent loss of its forest cover, almost complete loss of all
wetlands, and the compromise of its entire urban water supply, resulting in
open sewage seeping into drinking water.
The mortality rate for children under age five is one in four, double
the U.S. rate and due largely to diarrhea, respiratory infections,
malnutrition, and vaccine-preventable diseases.
Afghanistan has 2 million war widows and tens of thousands of
deaf-mute and disabled children and adults peddling on the streets. A total
of 6 million people—one third of the population—had to flee the country
during the wars. Meanwhile in 2001
in Afghanistan, the United States suffered only 936 military deaths.[vi]
When warriors return from war, they have fulfilled an honorable role. They
have earned the respect of their country.
There are often a series of rituals which welcome them back to the
civil society and shed them of their warrior-role.
In modern terminology, they are debriefed and re-integrated into
their communities. If the
warrior has lived by the principles of their warrior role, there is a
synergy which encourages a smooth role transition.
American soldiers-not warriors- face huge obstacles to successful transition
from military deployment to returning veteran status. The nature of warfare
has changed. Consider the
following:
Almost all soldiers in Iraq know someone who was seriously injured or
killed. 70% have seen dead or
injured soldiers and almost half have had to uncover or handle human
remains. Even in Vietnam there
were safe areas where people could go to rest and recuperate. That doesn’t
happen in Iraq; every place is a war zone.[vii]
Although our generals did not expect the fighting to turn to
guerrilla warfare, with the advent of IEDs, - Improvised Explosive Devices-
and suicide bombers, military personnel are always wary of attack, attack
often from non traditional, unexpected sources.
“Collateral damage,” referring to the injury and deaths of innocent
civilians, women and children, is rampant.
One veteran noted “Nothing prepared me for the physical and spiritual
violation of war. I stayed for three
tours because I lived so much with death that I couldn’t come home.”
[ii]
Tick, Edward
War and the Soul: Healing Our
Nation’s Veterans from Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (Wheaton, IL:
Quest Books, 2005), p. 86.
[vii]
Robinson, Steve National Gulf
War Resource
Center
[READINGS]
READING:
F:
A whole night,
Thrown down near a friend
Already butchered
With his mouth
Baring its teeth
Toward the full moon:
With the congestion
Of his hands
Penetrating my silence,
I’ve written letters
Full of love.
Never have I been
So
Attached to life.[i]
READING G:
There is one other wall, of course,
One we never speak of.
One we never see,
One which separates memory from madness.
In a place no one offers flowers.
THE WALL WITHIN.
We permit no visitors.
Mine looks like any of a million
nameless, brick walls--
it stands in the tear-down ghetto of my soul;
that part of me which reason avoids
for fear of dirtying its cloths
and from atop which my sorrow and my rage
hurl bottles and invectives
at the rolled-up windows
of my passing youth.
Do you know the wall I mean?[ii]
[i]
Ungaretti, Giuseppi “A Whole Night” Translated by Ivo Mosley and
found in Murray, Joan (Ed.) Poems to Live By In Uncertain Times
(Boston: Beacon Press, 2001), p. 90
[ii]
Mason, Steve Taken from
“The Wall Within”, a poem written and delivered as part of the
dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall, November 10, 1984.
Veterans know that having been to hell and back, they are different. We
expect them to put war behind them and rejoin the ordinary flow of civilian
life. But it is impossible for them
to do so—and wrong of us to request it.
Whenever Robert Reiter is asked when he left Viet Nam, he answers,
“Last night. It will be that way till my soul leaves this old body.”
When the survivor cannot leave war’s expectations, values and losses
behind, it becomes the eternal present. This frozen war consciousness is the
condition we call post traumatic stress disorder.[i]
[i]
Tick, Edward op.cit., p. 98-99
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder affects thousands upon thousands of our
returning veterans, approximately 30 to 50% .
Factor in, as well, a suicide rate of 18 per day or almost 7000 per
year and you have a devastating picture of the mental health of our
veterans.[i]
Dr. Ray Healey, co-founder of Veterans Across America (VAA), noted a key
finding from VAA's 2006 veterans' employment study: "There is little demand
by private sector employers for military veterans because they are perceived
as contributing little or no business value."[ii]
[i]
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/
[ii]
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS108775+30-Jun-2008+PRN20080630
[READINGS]
H: Donald M. Murray wrote “After the bombs, the firefights, the mines, we
have a lifetime of silence. Those
who were on the front lines rarely speak of their war
if and when they do speak , it is done to develop excitement in the
story, to create humor, and enjoy the companionship of exchanging stories
that grow bigger and better after 3 or 4 beers carefully rehearsed by
advancing years. Having been to many American Legion meetings, VFW, and ship
reunions, I have heard veterans expound their exaggerated tales. With an
open mouth, they are telling their tales, but keeping secret their deepest
emotional substance. I know,
despite my hate for the taste of the flavor of alcohol, for about 5 years I
also used alcohol to disguise and relax my inward pain.[i]
[i]
Murray, Donald
“Shutting down emotions is a way of life in combat”
Boston Globe, 9/26/06.
I: Another mourned, “I thought I was going crazy, waking up in a sweat
trying to choke my wife, seeing signs of Charley around every corner when
the weather was hot and steamy. I’d always kept my feelings to myself, but
now I didn’t seem to have any feelings except anger.
I couldn’t get through a day without getting into a fight, and when I
tried to numb the pain with alcohol, I jut got more angry and out of
control. I left my wife and
kids because I was ashamed and afraid of what I was doing to them.”
Clearly, a great number of our veterans return with significant mental
health problems. Edward Tick in his groundbreaking book,
War and the Soul: Healing Our
Nation’s Veterans from Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, offers the
following
[READINGS]
J: Our leadership’s refusal to accept responsibility for our wars helps
explain the rage and mistrust veterans and their families often feel toward
authority. The young man or woman, after all, went to war in the
nation’s name. Except in rare instances, a soldier did not kill
because he was criminal or insane or possessed by selfish motives. To
the contrary, and while striving under the most adverse conditions, he
killed because the nation ordered him to do so in its service.
Ultimately, he killed because, otherwise, he and
his companions would be killed themselves. The nation and its leaders
defined the enemy, provided moral and ideological reasons to go to war,
trained the soldier for it, and put him in the kill-or-be killed situation,
and held responsible to be judged adversely if he did not.
Our society must accept the responsibility for its war making. To the
returning veteran, our leaders and people must say, “you did this in our
name and because you were subject to our orders We lift the burden of your
action from you and take it onto our shoulders. We are responsible for
you, for what
you did, and for the consequences.”
K: Without this transfer of responsibility, the veterans become the nation’s
scapegoat and carries it secret grief and guilt for all of us.
Psychologically and socially, veterans often crawl into the dark
corners of our culture and collapse under the crippling effect of carrying
the moral and spiritual burdens of an entire nation alone. This state
of affairs helps us explain the degree to which veterans become ill with
their feelings. Given our nation’s denial of responsibility and
disowning of suffering, the only socially acceptable role left for them to
collapse into is that of “disabled veteran.” It is this abandonment of them,
as much as the war experience, that causes PTSD.
Once the collective assumes responsibility for the war, the veteran’s PTSD
symptoms begin to disappear. The vet can stand with dignity, for even if
the war was immoral or ill-advised, even if we did or did not win, he or she
is still our honorable warrior returned from a war fought in our service.
It is imperative for the health of our veterans that they experience other
ordinary Americans and our leadership as walking with them and
accepting accountability for our wars.
Tick suggests a four stage approach to reintegration of our soldiers into
society. First, there must be
cleansing. In order to heal,
the veteran must safely descend back into the hellish memories that hold him
prisoner. If he is stuck, unable or unwilling to re-experience the actions
that have hurt his soul, in this descent, the veteran must recapture the
warrior in the self, the person who went to war for all the morally positive
reasons. Tick notes: “For
the survivor’s soul to heal, he or she must revisit the experience of war in
a way that tells the truth and frees the heart from bondage to the past. The
formula for successful return can be called an imaginal initiation into
warriorhood. This is a demanding process that requires several steps.
Even as war and violence are disowned, the original call to service
must be reaffirmed, and the universal pattern of the warrior that has been
damaged must be restored. Along the way, the veteran studies the history and
meaning of warriorhood, practices its traditions, and evaluates his past
experiences in this light. He
faces those people, places and memories he most fears . He stares his demons
in the face without resorting to violence.
He does service that redresses the wounds he caused.
He reshapes his identity in ways that include both the mythic
dimensions and the difficult realities of his experience. The new identity
that emerges constitutes a rebirth. He eventually achieves an initiation
through both inner change and outer deed and ritual. Achieving inner
warriorhood is a mark of a fully developed personality.
[i]
As the warrior proceeds through this process, the he or she cleanses the
self of its demons. One successful ritual in this process is the use of a
sweat lodge, which can provide a much needed symbolic transition from combat
zone to a world at peace.
The second step is storytelling, reframing the personal venture into the
community fabric. Stories often
reveal patterns and connections that might be missed without this purposeful
activity. The common threads
weave together, binding the participants in a public addition to the
collective history. It should be noted here, that very few veterans offer
their story spontaneously. In fact, for those who freely share their
adventures and also carry their demons, they are likely to become addicted
to the “high” of the effect and generalize their behavior to other risk
taking behaviors. It is only after the cleansing process that they are ready
to authentically share.
Tick makes a strong plea for the community to take on the moral
responsibility of the story. With the release of that responsibility the
veteran will be more able to dig deeper into the feelings that are buried
below the surface and to begin the healing process. This is the third step.
“The social group must not only witness the stories of its warriors; it must
also accept responsibility for their deeds during war and their condition
afterward.”[ii]
The group must take responsibility for the betrayal of the warrior.
Most often, the war that soldiers experience is not the war that they
thought that they were signing up for. Their mental state and reception when
they return, are astounding, unexpected developments. Is it no wonder that
drug addiction, homelessness, divorce and abuse are so elevated in this
population. Society, that is,
WE must step up to the plate and reclaim these warriors.
The final rehabilitative step is a full reclaiming of the warrior
mentality.
[READING]
L: The final step in the long road home for the veteran is completing this
initiation as a warrior. A
veteran does not become a warrior merely for having gone to war.
A veteran becomes a warrior when he learns to carry his war skills
and his vision in mature ways.
He becomes a warrior when he has been set right with life again.
A warrior’s first priority is to protect life rather than destroy it.
He serves his nation in peace as well as in war making and dissuades
his people from suffering the scourges of war unless absolutely necessary.
He uses the fearlessness he has developed to help keep sanity,
generosity and order alive in his culture. A warrior disciplines the
violence within himself.
Internally and externally, he stares violence in the face and makes it back
down. A warrior serves higher spiritual and moral principles which he places
higher than himself. The role of warrior has a high, noble and honorable
status.
[iii]
World War I ended on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh
month in 1918. A year later, Woodrow Wilson proclaimed November 11,
Armistice Day in the hope that it would be associated with the quest for
world peace. The modern era has
not lived up to that hope. World peace is still an illusion, but right now,
we have a more immediate quest at our doorstep. We must work to bring peace
to the veterans. We must not
accept this collateral damage. I urge us not to accept the substandard
treatment at Walter Reed Hospital where
the typical soldier is required to file 22 documents with eight different
commands to enter and exit the system.
Sixteen different information systems are used to process the forms,
but few can communicate with one another. As of the beginning of this year,
the Army’s three personnel databases could not [sic] read each other’s files
and could not [sic] interact with each other.
[iv]
I implore us not to simply smile knowingly when on NPR we hear the story of
Barry Cooper. Mr.Cooper is a former Narcotics
Officer, who is so known for making successful drug busts that he travels
around the country training officers.
When he does this training, after he finishes his workshop, he goes
out with a squad car. He promises that if he does not make one arrest in
that night the whole training is free. In all the years that he has
been offering this gimmick, he has never given away a free training. How
does he do it? Well, he says,
first, he looks for a veteran’s license plate since he knows so many of them
came back with a habit………[v]
Support our troops. That is the title of today’s sermon and it is the
sound-byte that I would like to leave you with.
Support our troops. They are our sons, our daughters, our families,
our future. On this day we want
to do more than “honor” our veterans we want to offer them the support which
they so poignantly deserve.
May it be so.
[i]
Tick, Edward, op.cit. p.
198
[iv]
Priest, Dana and Hull, Anne
“Soldiers Face Neglect, Frustration at Army’s Top Medical
Facility: Washington
Post February 18, 2007
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701172
[v]
NPR Interview, October 31, 2007.
|